Skip to main content
Menu

Decision contexts

Apply the CEA decision workflow to a defined project context.

The same underlying workflow can support different project decisions. Each solution begins with the decision to be made, the available evidence, the responsible reviewers and the output required.

01

New project or major retrofit

Decision: Whether a proposed project or configuration is sufficiently defined for the next capital, design or procurement commitment.

New vertical farms, new hydroponic greenhouses and major greenhouse or facility retrofits.

02

Supplier evidence and configuration comparison

Decision: Which supplier or equipment alternative satisfies the stated requirements, and what remains unresolved before selection.

Supplier documents, equipment claims, exclusions, operating conditions and project-specific configuration choices.

03

CEA project evidence review

Decision: Whether the available project evidence, assumptions and unresolved dependencies support a defined project or capital decision.

Feasibility, configuration, procurement or material-change decisions requiring a bounded review of the available record.

This workflow supports project-evidence review. It is not investment advice, valuation or an assurance engagement.

Secondary context

Existing-farm work is considered only where a bounded decision, sufficient records and responsible reviewers can be defined.

Existing-farm expansion and operating review

A scoped review of existing operating records, assumptions and expansion alternatives where sufficient evidence and responsible reviewers are available. This is not a live operations-management or optimisation system.

Review this context

Capability availability depends on current Platform status and the separately agreed project or beta scope.

Review Product Status

Begin with the decision and the evidence available.

Use the project route for professional work, or review current Platform status for a product-validation scope.