Skip to main content
Menu
Turn a farm-project brief into a controlled delivery record.

Turn a farm-project brief into a controlled delivery record.

The Crop Urbanis Platform structures site, crop, utility, market, supplier, budget and delivery evidence; compares configuration alternatives; retains assumptions; and prepares controlled outputs under qualified review. The core workflow operates as an internal MVP; private-beta access is considered for selected organisations by contact.

Operational internal MVP · Selective organisational beta

The core workflow is operational inside Crop Urbanis. Selected organisations can be considered for a separately scoped private beta covering data, confidentiality, authorised users, responsibilities, support and evaluation. Public self-service is not offered.

The Platform connects the evidence that drives a CEA decision with the requirements, calculations, reviews and outputs that follow from it.

One project record, not disconnected documents

Project inputs

Project objective, buyer, site and geography
Building, utility, climate and regulatory constraints
Crop targets, production assumptions and operating context
Supplier documents, equipment specifications, budget and delivery dependencies

Core Platform workflow

Capture the brief Bring project files and facts into a structured evidence record.
Model requirements Normalise constraints, missing data, responsibilities and validation questions.
Configure alternatives Compare crop, system and delivery choices against stated assumptions.
Run controlled scenarios Keep production, economics and sensitivity inputs deterministic and reviewable.
Compare supplier evidence Retain sources, exclusions, dependencies and open clarification points.
Record decisions and approvals Make expert review, customer decisions and partner responsibilities auditable.
Assemble delivery outputs Prepare controlled inputs for delivery, commissioning, handover and operation.

Controlled record

Source links, versions, requirements and constraints
Missing information, conflicts, alternatives and assumptions
Deterministic scenarios, supplier comparison, risks and dependencies
Decisions, approvals, delivery and handover outputs

The core modules are operational in the internal MVP. Their availability in a selected organisational beta depends on scope; the Operations Feedback Layer remains roadmap or scoped validation.

Eight connected Platform modules

Operational in internal MVP

Project Brief and Data Room

Create one controlled CEA project record from a brief and permitted source material.

Operational in internal MVP

Requirements and Constraint Model

Turn project inputs into explicit, source-aware requirements and constraints.

Operational in internal MVP

Crop and Production Configuration

Make crop, system and production assumptions comparable before a project direction is selected.

Operational in internal MVP

Supplier and Equipment Intelligence

Compare supplier and equipment information against defined project requirements.

Operational in internal MVP

Scenario and Economics Engine

Compare production and financial options through controlled assumptions and deterministic calculations.

Operational in internal MVP

Delivery and Decision Control

Govern project choices, dependencies, changes and decision gates across a defined delivery scope.

Operational in internal MVP

Commissioning and Handover Pack

Turn an approved configuration into controlled readiness, commissioning, training and handover inputs.

Roadmap

Operations Feedback Layer

Feed operating evidence and qualified learning back into later project and protocol decisions.

Review detailed module status

AI, deterministic models and people have different jobs

AI assistance

Supports document extraction, terminology normalisation, retrieval from permitted knowledge, source-aware comparison, missing-information detection, contradiction detection, controlled drafting and multilingual transformation—not autonomous decisions.

Deterministic services

Handle units and conversions, capacity, crop-cycle scenarios, production assumptions, utility constraints, equipment compatibility, CAPEX/OPEX, sensitivity analysis and project gates with inspectable assumptions.

Qualified review

Named professionals and project owners approve agronomic assumptions, engineering decisions, safety and regulatory matters, supplier confirmation, financial and commercial decisions, and commissioning acceptance.

Private-beta boundary

A selected scope can include an organisation-specific project workspace, agreed project and supplier data, defined modules, named review roles, controlled outputs, feedback against evaluation criteria and export or handover conditions. It does not imply autonomous agronomy, engineering approval, investment advice or guaranteed project performance.

Read the product record in context

These routes explain the operational internal MVP, current module scope, technology, private-beta boundary and public-form data boundary.

Share high-level context about the organisation, project stage, data types, responsible reviewers and desired outcome. Do not submit confidential project files through the public form.