Establish the project baseline
Define the decision objective, authorised material, constraints, owners and unresolved questions.
How It Works
This page explains who contributes, who reviews and who retains authority as the same six-step Platform workflow moves forward.
Shared sequence
Define the decision objective, authorised material, constraints, owners and unresolved questions.
Retain the statement, source location, conditions, units and evidence status.
Relate project requirements to supplier, configuration and operating alternatives.
Apply approved assumptions and reproducible calculations to explicit alternatives.
Record evidence gaps, sensitivities, exceptions and the roles required to resolve them.
Preserve the rationale, review state, conditions and downstream project requirements.
The workflow records responsibility; it does not transfer authority between parties.
Owns the decision objective, authorised project material, commercial priorities, final organisational acceptance and designation of responsible reviewers.
May contribute project and agronomic framing, evidence structuring, comparison and design-case preparation, review coordination and decision-record preparation where included in the agreed scope.
Own engineering confirmation, supplier warranties and claims, regulatory or safety review, contractual commitments, installation and commissioning responsibilities within their scope.
Performs structured recording, source linking, requirements mapping, comparison support, reproducible calculations, review-state recording and decision continuity where implemented.
Outputs
The Platform structures evidence and decision records. Organisations, suppliers and relevant professionals retain authority and responsibility within their own technical, commercial, legal and regulated scopes.