Evidence register
Prepared for review within the agreed scope.
CEA decision context
CEA project evidence review
Determine whether the available project evidence, assumptions and unresolved dependencies support a defined project or capital decision.
Decision to be made
CEA project evidence review
Determine whether the available project evidence, assumptions and unresolved dependencies support a defined project or capital decision.
Project context
Where this workflow applies
A bounded review of project evidence for a named decision. It is not investment advice, valuation or an assurance engagement.
Material inputs
Begin with permissioned, relevant evidence.
High-level project baseline, source material categories, requirements, assumptions, alternatives and responsible roles are agreed before detailed processing.
Platform workflow
Use the same six-step decision workflow.
Establish the baseline, capture source claims, map requirements and alternatives, build design cases, review uncertainty and dependencies, then record and carry forward the decision.
Reviewed outputs
Name the record required for the decision.
Outputs are specific records, not a generic product claim.
Assumption register
Prepared for review within the agreed scope.
Dependency and gap record
Prepared for review within the agreed scope.
Review questions
Prepared for review within the agreed scope.
Decision-support summary
Prepared for review within the agreed scope.
Responsible parties
The record does not transfer authority.
The organisation owns its decision; suppliers own their claims and commitments; relevant professionals own technical, legal, safety and regulated review within their scope; Crop Urbanis performs only the work included in the agreed engagement.
Current product boundary
Capability availability follows the canonical status register.
This workflow supports project-evidence review. It is not investment advice, valuation or an assurance engagement. Capability availability depends on current Platform status and the separately agreed scope.
Status and resources
Continue with the canonical source.
Review current Platform status for implementation and validation; use Technology for architecture and Research for research maturity.
Current Platform status
Implementation, limitations and roadmap.
Technology
Architecture and technical governance.